The Otehaihai Post Shop only sells two denominations of stamps for larger letters and for parcels.

It has $3 stamps and stamps of some other value.

It can make up any amount of postage from $24 onwards.

It can’t make up $23.

What is the value of the other denomination?

In this problem students are given one stamp denomination and the smallest postal value, and asked to find the other denomination. Guess and check is one approach that students may use, however the Extension problem also involves the constructing of proofs. Students are likely to need support here as this construction may prove challenging. However, this is an important aspect of this problem, as it will develop mathematical skills of conjecturing (guessing), proving and using algebra.

Other problems in this series include $3 and $5 Stamps, Number, Level 3, __$4 and $7 Stamps__, Number, Level 5, $5 and $9 Stamps, Number, Level 5, __What is t?__, and __What is s and t?__, Algebra, Level 6. However proof and generalisations only become evident at this level (Level 6).

### The Problem

The Otehaihai Post Shop only sells two denominations of stamps for larger letters and for parcels. It has $3 stamps and stamps of some other value. It can make up any amount of postage from $24 onwards. It can’t make up $23. What is the value of the other denomination?

#### Teaching Sequence

- Discuss mail. Ask:

How often do you or your family post letters and parcels?

Why have postage stamps become more expensive?

Who thinks there will still be letter mail in 5 years? Why do you think that? - Pose the problem to the class. Discuss how they might solve the problem. Make sure that they understand that there are two key ideas here. The value of s has to be such that it produces 24, 25
**and**26 but that it doesn’t produce 23. - Have the students work on the problem with a partner.
- If students struggle suggest that they experiment with various values of s (and keep a record of their work as it will be useful later).
- Share students’ solutions. Note any different methods of solution.
- In the Extension, the students will probably need the following hints: (i) experiment with different values of s to get some ideas; and (ii) in the proof, use s = 3k + 1 and 3k + 2 (why?). But help them to see the need for (ii) by using several values of s in (i).
- Allow time for the students to write up what they have discovered.

#### Extension to the problem

If the Post Shop has $3 and s$ stamps, and every amount of postage can be made from a given point on, what is the smallest value of that given point?

#### Solution

Let s be the value of the unknown denomination. The simplest way to do this problem is to guess and check. So you might guess s = 10. But 23 = 3 + 2 x 10. Guess s = 11. But experiments will show that that guess is incorrect too. By gradually increasing the value of s you could discover that s is probably 13. Then, you need to justify that 13 does not give 23 but that it does give everything from 24 onwards. (It’s necessary to do this otherwise we can’t be sure that s = 13 fits all the data of the original problem.)

A preferred method is to know that in general the lowest ‘point’ is 2(s – 1). This can then be equated to 24 and the linear equation solved to give s = 13.

(However, we don’t justify this lowest point until the Extension.)

#### Solution to the extension

With 3 and s we can make 2(s – 1) and everything from then on but we can’t make 2(s – 1) – 1. The value of 2(s – 1) has to be guessed by experimenting with various values of s. But we have to be careful to remember that 3 and s have no factors in common (see __$3 and $5 Stamps__, Number, Level 3).

**Proof**: Using the proof method of $3 and $5 Stamps, we need to show that we can get 2(s – 1), 2(s – 1) + 1, 2(s – 1) + 2. Then we need to show that we can’t get 2(s – 1) – 1.

**2(s – 1)**. Now this must become a linear combination of 3 and s. But with 2(s – 1) = 2s – 2, this isn’t obvious. Check with s = 5, 7, and a few other values to see if this gives us any insight. It does because it suggests that we should write s as either 3k + 1 or 3k + 2. (It can’t be 3k as 3 and s have no factors in common.)

If s = 3k + 1, then 2s – 2 = 6k + 2 – 2 = 6k = 3(2k). We can do this with only $3 stamps.

If s = 3k + 2, then 2s – 2 = 6k + 4 – 2 = 6k + 2 = 3k + 3k + 2 = 3k + s. We can do this with $3 and s$ stamps.

**2(s – 1) + 1**

To do this we need to follow in the footsteps of 2(s – 1).

If s = 3k + 1, then 2(s – 1) + 1 = 2s – 1 = 6k + 2 – 1 = 6k + 1 = 3k + (3k + 1) = 3k + s.

If s = 3k + 2, then 2(s – 1) + 1 = 2s – 1 = 6k + 4 – 1 = 6k + 3 = 3(2k + 1).

**2(s – 1) + 2**

= 2s – 2 + 2 = 2s. So this is easy, we just use two s$ stamps here.

But then there is the problem of why we can’t do 2(s – 1) – 1. How do we prove that something can’t happen? One way is to assume that it does and show that this leads to something that is clearly false. This implies that the original assumption had to be wrong. So let us assume that there exist numbers of stamps a and b such that 2(s – 1) – 1 = 3a + bs.

Rearranging we get 2s – bs = 3a + 3. So s(2 – b) = 3(a + 1). Now we know that s has no factors in common with 3. But 3 divides the right hand side of the equation, so 3 divides the left hand side. So 3 divides 2 – b. Since 2 – b has to be positive (because the right hand side is), 2 – b has to be 1. But 3 doesn’t divide 1 so we have our contradiction.